|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Spanics are a bunch of liars and we already know this. Their continuous reference
to being LATINOS ( Latins) it's famous in our daily lives in the United States of America.
These skunks have No shame!
However, the worst offenders are the PANDERERS and these are our "illuminate"Politicians
at all level of Government, the different religious leaders,academicians,poets,
singers, writers and best of all our Dictionaries no matters who edits them.
ALL THESE CON ARTISTS OF HISTORY,ALL THESE FAKERS OF HISTORY WHO HAVE NEVER SHOWN
ANY INTEREST FOR THE GREATNESS OF EUROPEAN CIVILIZATION,NOW, LOVERS OF MULTI-ANIMA-
LIST-RACE-MIXING INTEGRATION ARE ON THE THE FOREFRONT OF A MOVEMENT FOR THE DEMISE OF
OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION BY THEIR ACTIONS AND OTHER DEEDS.
NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD WE HAVE SEEN TRAITORS AMONG OURSELVES WHOSE ONLY PURPOSE IS
PURPOSE IS THE DOWNGRADING OF THE WHITE RACE AND THE GLORIFICATION OF INFERIOR
CULTURES IN ORDER TO CREATE A UNIVERSAL RACE, CULTURE AND CIVILIZATION WHICH IS
THE ONE-WAY ROAD FOR SELF-DEMISE.
As most people understand,Dictionaries are supposed to reflect the rational,
historical and unbiased interpretation of words and not to be the a means of
personal views for anarchists and to impose them on the rest of the society.
Well, don't believe anymore on the validity of references and interpretations of
whatever you wish to discover in a Dictionary. Whatever definition you see
in a word is nothing but the thought and conclusion of one or more editors,can be anyone,
based on their political, cultural or peer pressure agenda.
Spanics will always push the Dictionaries to write a definition of Latino according
to their misinterpretation and ignorance of history and other factors. Blacks
also will exercise tremendous influence in whatever they want to accomplish
whether is right to do do or wrong because for them is still right!
For the purpose of clarification I will write down an entire e-mail comment made
by me on 9-16-2007 addressed to:Merriam-Webster Dictionary.
The subject stated was: " Your "Latino" definition.
This is what I wrote:
You are totally incorrect saying that a Latino/a is a person from "Latin America" or of
Latin American origin living in the USA.
Your biased arrogance cannot be left unchallenged.
It all started in Italy and you'd better learn Roman History and not bestow
honorary title to Spanish-speaking unwanted gypsies.
A Latino is an Italian man.
A Latina is an Italian woman.
Spanish-speaking people of the "Americas" have no Latin identity other than the
origin of " Spanish Language". (Which comes from Italy)
As you are ignorant on this subject I'm not going to engage in any theses with you.
Therefore, I only will cite appropriate forum from which you can gather the
knowledge necessary for the business you are in.
Visit the blog:http://www.real-latins.org
Note: "Latin America" or "Amerique Latine" was a French invention. However it ceased to
exist when the European colonization ended. At any rate" America Latina" (a wrong label)
cannot translate into Latino or Latina.
Your lies in the Dictionaries must be corrected as you are distorting history in favor of a despite group.
THIS WAS THE THE ANSWER FROM THESE ENEMIES OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION AND PANDERERS.
Here it is:
Dear R......
Thanks for your e-mail. As you may know, we enter words in our dictionaries based on their use in
current printed and edited sources. A word is only entered in our dictionaries when it meeets three
criteria: widespread used in well-read publications;established usage over a certain period of time;
and an easily discernable definition. For a word to be entered,then,it will need
to appear in a number of well-read sources for a good number of years.
I did a quick check of our citational files,which house upwards of 17 million citation of words in
contest ,but find that in English prose sources, "Latino" is used almost exclusively
to refer to a person from Latin America or a Latin American person who resides in
the U.S. We cannot change the definition until we see a quorum of citational
evidence suggesting a different use.
For more information on how a word is entered into our dictionaries,visit
http:://merriam-webster.com/help/faq/words in.htm and if you have any further question or comments,please
contact us again.
Sincerely,
Kory Stamper, Associate Editor
Merriam-Webster,Inc.
http://www.Merriam-webster.com
http://www.wordcentral.co
http://www.merriam-websterunabridged.com
THE INTERPRETATION OF THE ABOVE LETTER TO ME IS VERY CLEAR: IF A PERSON OR A GROUP LIES LONG ENOUGH
THOSE LIES BECOME STANDARD AND ACCEPTABLE IS BEING TRUE.
I URGE ALL PATRIOTS AND ALL NON-SPANISH SPEAKING EUROPEANS NOT TO BUY ANY DICTIONARIES EITHER FROM
MERRIAM-WEBSTER OR FROM OTHER COMPANIES UNTIL THEY STOP THE PANDERING AND THEIR
LIES.
*********************************************************************************
I SENT THEM A REPLY THEN SILENCE
This is my reply to their stupid irrational conclusion:
Hi,a lie is a lie and will continue to be a lie. Those Ibero-Indians of the " so-
called Americas" at best can call themselves "Latin Americans" The word Latin American cannot translate
into Latino or Latina. Just because a bunch of mestizo-red-skin or Spanish speaking
Whites want to call themselves "Latinos" or " Latinas" you think that's right to
make it official denying the real identity of the Italian people.
You(r) claim that you need to have a large segment of a population using that term for a long time to
include it in your dictionaries is contrary to any sense of credibility that you(r) dictionaries might have.
That is, your definitions are a product of individual collaborators who are
interested in pushing forward their own agenda. This case has been discussed for years in different
discussion boards by Italian, Spaniards and other Europeans who are fed up in
hearing despicable people using and abusing our Roma(n)/Latin Identity.
We Italians have been Latins/Latinos/Latinas for more than 2000 years. Not enough?
Can you just read an history book?
You(We) may have to consider sending you a cease and desist order or if all fails
legal action will have to be undertaken as your action amount to alienation of
culture and defamation. History is on our side no matter how long or how certain
people want to call themselves.
I want to clarify a point. When I first said " a bunch of mestizo-red-skin or spanish-
speaking "WHITES", I never meant to include our Sister and Brothers, the SPANIARDS.
*********************************************************************************
WE HAVE STARTED A MOVEMENT AGAINST ALL THE DICTIONARIES AND
HAVE SOUGHT HELP TO SUE ANYONE, ANY GROUP,INCLUDING THE DICTIONARIES
AND SETTLE THE CASE WITH ALL THESE LIARS.
|Tyrants in Washington,D.C.|
|Tyranny|
|Oppressive Laws|
|We demand|
|Internet Links|
|Supremacy? Clause|
|News|
|FAQ|
|People's Militia|
|Anchor mestizo Rats|
|Custom|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
